HARO for Startups: How to Earn Backlinks and Press
HARO (Help a Reporter Out, now Connectively) is a free service connecting journalists with expert sources. Startups that answer relevant queries with sharp, usable quotes can earn backlinks and brand mentions in high-authority publications. This guide walks founders through signing up, finding the right queries, writing pitches journalists actually use, and measuring the results.
TL;DR
- HARO (now Connectively) is a free way to earn editorial backlinks by answering journalist source requests.
- Winning a HARO pitch usually means a quote plus a link from a trusted outlet, which builds domain authority.
- Speed, relevance, and a quotable insight matter more than polished prose.
- Track results by referring domains, brand mentions, and referral traffic, not just raw link count.
- If HARO does not fit your cadence, alternatives like Featured, Qwoted, and SourceBottle can fill the gap.
What Is HARO and How Does It Work for Startups?
HARO stands for Help a Reporter Out. It launched in 2008 as a way to connect journalists who need sources with experts who have something to say. After years under Cision, the service was folded into Connectively, which now runs the platform. The mechanics are simple: a journalist or blogger posts a query describing the story they are writing and the kind of source they need, along with a deadline. Experts read the query and reply with a short pitch. The reporter picks the strongest responses, and when the article publishes, quoted sources typically get a backlink and a brand mention.
The flow is straightforward. You sign up as a source, select the topic categories you can genuinely speak to, and start receiving email digests with open queries. You reply before the deadline with a useful, quotable answer. If the journalist chooses you, your quote and a link to your site appear in a published article. There is no payment changing hands on the core tier; the value you trade is expertise, and the value you earn is earned media.
For a startup, this matters for two reasons. First, editorial links from trusted publications are among the strongest authority signals search engines read. Second, as answer engines and large language models increasingly decide which brands to surface, being cited in respected outlets feeds the same trust signals those systems weigh. This is the same logic behind AEO link building and AI citation building: build a footprint of credible, consistent mentions and both search and AI systems learn to trust you.
Why Should a Startup Use HARO Instead of Just Doing Outreach?
Cold outreach and HARO pursue the same end goal -- a backlink -- but they work in opposite directions. Outreach asks a site owner for a link to your content. HARO gives a journalist something they actively need: a qualified source who can strengthen their story. When you answer a query well, the link is not a favor you requested; it is part of the editorial work of publishing the article. That is why HARO links are considered earned media rather than negotiated links.
The authority difference is also meaningful. A link you earn by being quoted in an established publication carries the editorial credibility of that outlet. Search engines have long treated editorial, in-content links from reputable sites as a strong signal. Compared to paid PR, where a retainer can run thousands of dollars a month for placements you cannot guarantee, HARO costs your time -- and on the core tier, nothing else. That makes it one of the most cost-efficient channels available to an early-stage team.
HARO is a specific tactic, not a full strategy. It works best as one part of a broader program that also includes digital PR for link building and consistent on-site publishing. If you think of HARO as a steady drip of earned mentions, it compounds: each win adds a referring domain, and over months that portfolio raises your overall authority profile in a way a single campaign cannot.
How Do You Set Up a HARO Workflow?
HARO rewards consistency, and consistency comes from a repeatable workflow rather than bursts of enthusiasm. Start by signing up on Connectively as a source and verifying your email. Then choose your categories carefully. The platform serves dozens of topics, but you should only subscribe to the handful where you can speak with real authority. A founder who answers SaaS, marketing, and startup questions will do far better than one who signs up for every category and replies half-heartedly.
Next, route the daily digests so they do not get lost in a crowded inbox. Set up an email filter or label that funnels HARO emails into a dedicated folder, and check it at fixed times -- many successful users check once or twice a day, shortly after the digest arrives. Journalists often pick early, qualified responses, so speed is a real advantage. Responding within the first hours of a query going live materially improves your odds.
Finally, decide who answers. For high-level strategy, product, or industry questions, the founder's voice usually carries the most weight and reads as most authentic. For volume and consistency, a product marketer or content lead can manage the routine, as long as the answers reflect genuine expertise and are not boilerplate. Build a small library of assets up front: a two-sentence professional bio, a headshot, and your website URL, so every pitch goes out the same way.
How Do You Write a Pitch a Journalist Will Actually Use?
Reporters are not looking for vendors; they are looking for a sentence they can drop into an article. The single most effective thing you can do is lead with the insight, not with your company. Open with the answer to their question or a sharp, surprising point of view, and let your credentials follow. If your pitch reads like a marketing email, it will be skipped.
Concrete detail beats adjectives. Instead of saying your startup "helps companies grow," cite the specific result you have seen, the exact mistake you made, or the firsthand data you have collected. Journalists prize real numbers and lived experience because both make their story more credible. Where you have data, share it; where you have a story, tell it briefly. Just make sure anything you claim is something you can stand behind.
Keep it short -- two to four sentences plus a quote-ready line. Many journalists appreciate a sentence they can lift verbatim, so craft one that is crisp, self-contained, and quotable. End with a brief bio, a headshot, and your website so the publication has everything it needs to link and credit you properly. Then respect the deadline. A great pitch that arrives after the reporter has already filed is worth nothing.
What Are the Most Common HARO Mistakes?
The most frequent mistake is pitching off-topic. Answering a query about restaurant supply chains with your SaaS pricing advice wastes everyone's time and trains reporters to ignore you. Read each query closely and only respond when you are genuinely the right source. A smaller number of well-matched replies beats a high volume of irrelevant ones.
Being too salesy is a close second. Reporters can smell a promotional pitch in the first line, and they will drop it. Resist the urge to mention your product features unless they are directly relevant to the question. The goal is to be helpful, not to advertise; the backlink is the reward for helpfulness, not the topic of your answer.
Missing deadlines and lacking a quotable angle round out the list. Because early responses get read first, a late pitch often goes unseen. And even a relevant, on-time pitch fails if it is generic -- if the reporter cannot extract a usable quote, they will pass. Every answer should contain at least one line a journalist could publish as-is, plus the credentials that make your voice credible.
What Are the Best HARO Alternatives for Startups?
HARO is the best-known option, but it is not the only one, and different platforms fit different teams. Some founders prefer curated, higher-match queries; others want a budget-friendly community. The table below compares HARO with four of the most common alternatives so you can match the tool to your resources and goals.
| Service | Cost | Query volume | Typical outlet authority | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARO (Connectively) | Free core tier | High | High-authority national and trade press | Startups wanting free editorial links at scale |
| Featured (formerly Terkel) | Paid per response | Medium | Mid-to-high authority niche and national outlets | Teams wanting curated, higher-match queries |
| Qwoted | Free and paid tiers | Medium | High-authority mainstream and trade media | Founders comfortable pitching through a platform |
| Help a B2B Writer | Free community | Medium | Mid-authority B2B and marketing outlets | B2B SaaS and marketing startups |
| SourceBottle | Free | Low to medium | Mid-authority niche and lifestyle outlets | Budget-conscious and niche startups |
No single platform is strictly better. A lean startup might run HARO for the free volume and add Featured or Qwoted if it wants more control over which queries reach its inbox. The key is to treat whichever platform you choose as a system, not a one-off experiment.
How Do You Measure Whether HARO Is Working?
HARO is a long game, so measure it like one. The first metric to watch is backlink count and, more importantly, the number of unique referring domains you earn. Ten links from one site are worth far less than one link each from ten different sites, so referring domains are the truer signal of growing authority.
Next, watch your domain authority movement and referral traffic. Authority scores are third-party estimates, so treat them as a directional trend rather than a precise grade, and pair them with the actual referral visitors arriving from the outlets that quoted you. If a placement drives no traffic today, it may still build authority that pays off later, but traffic is the clearest sign a mention is resonating with real readers.
Finally, track brand mentions. Not every placement is a link, and some journalists will mention your company without one. Log every win -- the outlet, the date, the anchor text if any, and the URL -- so you can see the full picture and follow up on unlinked mentions politely. Over a quarter, this record tells you whether HARO is a worthwhile use of founder time or a channel to hand off. For a deeper look at building a sustainable link profile, see startup link building strategies.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Is HARO and Is It Still Free?
HARO is now operated as Connectively, and its core source tier remains free. You sign up as a source, receive journalist queries by email, and reply at no cost. Some paid tiers and features exist, but most startups can earn placements using only the free tier and their time.
How Long Does It Take to Get a HARO Backlink?
There is no fixed timeline. A journalist may publish within days of your reply, or the article may take weeks. Because reporters pick only a fraction of the responses they receive, expect to pitch consistently for a while before landing your first win, and treat HARO as an ongoing habit rather than a one-time campaign.
Can a Non-US Startup Use HARO?
Yes. HARO and Connectively accept sources from around the world, and many queries are not geographically limited. The main requirement is that you can genuinely answer the question and meet the deadline. If a query is location-specific, it will usually say so in the request.
Should the Founder or a PR Agency Answer?
Either can work, but the voice that gets picked is the one that sounds like a real expert. Founders often win high-level and strategy queries because they can speak from firsthand experience, while an agency or product marketer can handle volume and routine responses. The key is authenticity: whoever answers should know the topic deeply.
Do HARO Links Actually Help SEO?
Yes, when earned properly. Editorial links from respected publications are a strong authority signal, and a diverse set of referring domains supports better rankings over time. The value comes from relevance and trust, so a few quality placements from reputable outlets outweigh a pile of low-authority links.